| 翻訳と辞書 |
| California Artificial Stone Paving Co. v. Molitor ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
California Artificial Stone Paving Co. v. Molitor
''California Artificial Stone Paving Co. v. Molitor'', , involved a bill that was filed by the appellant against the appellee complaining that the latter was infringing on a letters patent granted to one John J. Schillinger, and which had been assigned for the State of California to the complainant.〔(California Artificial Stone Paving Co. v. Molitor, 113 U.S. 609 (1885) ) ''Justia.com''〕
The patent was for an improvement in concrete pavement was originally issued July 19, 1870, and reissued May 2, 1871. The improvement, as described in the reissued patent, consisted in laying the pavement in detached blocks separated from each other by strips of tar paper or other suitable material so as to prevent the blocks from adhering to each other. As stated in the specification:
The case of Wilson v. Barnum was especially worthy of note in this connection. The question certified in that case was whether, upon the evidence given, the defendant infringed the complainant's patent. Chief Justice Taney, delivering the opinion of the Court, said:
The case was dismissed, with directions to the circuit court to proceed therein according to law.
==See also==
*List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 113
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「California Artificial Stone Paving Co. v. Molitor」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|